Chittenden Solid Waste District v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. 169 Vt. 153 (April 9, 1999) and In re Chittenden Solid Waste District, 163 Vt. 185 (January 20, 1995) Attorney Sullivan represented Chittenden Solid Waste District in proceedings to establish the necessity for the taking of property by eminent domain for use as a […]
Vermont Supreme Court
Hinesburg v. Dunkling
Hinesburg v. Dunkling, 167 Vt. 514 (April 10, 1998) Attorney Murphy represented a landowner in regard to the adequacy of notice of a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Vermont Supreme Court: Hinesburg v. Dunkling
Hinesburg v. Dunkling, 167 Vt. 514 (April 10, 1998) Attorney Murphy represented a landowner in regard to the adequacy of notice of a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Vermont Supreme Court: Morse v. Murphy
Morse v. Murphy, 157 Vt. 410 (July 19, 1991) Attorney Murphy represented landowners in a case involving deed interpretation regarding a right of way.
Route 4 Association v. Town of Shelburne
Route 4 Assoc. v. Town of Shelburne, 154 Vt. 461 (June 15, 1990) Attorney Murphy represented a town in regard to the interpretation of its zoning ordinance.
State v. Central Vermont Railway
State v. Central Vermont Railway, 153 Vt. 337 (December 22, 1989) Attorney Murphy represented CVR in a precedent-setting case regarding the public trust doctrine in regard to lands submerged between navigable waters. The case involved the redevelopment of the downtown Burlington waterfront.